The Engel Matrix Has You

I don’t usually discuss RPG reports here, but I ran a session today that was a little different. It was using the Engel Matrix system, rules available here. The Engel Matrix system is fascinating, but only arguably even counts as an RPG–it truly is the group storytelling system that other games claim to be.

In my experience today, the game’s major strength is that every player has a large degree of control over what happens and there’s very little downtime. It’s three hours of constant activity for everyone. The weakness is that because every player is narrating “what happens,” but sometimes those things just don’t end up occurring, it’s easy to get confused as to what actually has happened and what hasn’t. We all got lost at points.

For your amusement, the game setup information for my session, the jumping off point my players used, is given below the cut.

The Eleventh Bell

The Time
The very near future

The Mood
Arguments will be judged for likelihood based on movie pacing and realism, not real-world realism. For instance, any argument that will destroy the world in the first “15 minutes” of on-screen time is going to be weak, no matter how reasonable it seems. Likewise, jumping onto a helicopter is going to almost always work, even if it’s actually a difficult feat.

The Scenario
Dr. Travis Fitzgerald, a researcher at Columbia University, has just stumbled on a deadly discovery–a cheap, easy-to-create weapon with the destructive power of a hydrogen bomb. He has considered keeping it secret entirely, but he considers the idea too easy to come across, and the resulting danger too great. Someone must be told so the world can be made prepared. But who?

The Device
Three significant technologies are required. None are particularly expensive or hard to get.

1. Heavy water–that is, water made with deuterium instead of ordinary hydrogen. Its properties are almost identical except that it is, as the name implies, slightly heavier. A drinking glassful costs $50, and enough for a weapon costs around $500. Heavy water is not radioactive or otherwise dangerous on its own.

2. An ultrasound machine and its associated instruments. An adequate device costs around $10000, accessories not included.

3. Something Else, to be decided by argument during the game. The properties of this third technology or component may play a large part in the outcome. This could be a technology, an object, a material, a precise measurement, or something else. Advocates for characters wanting to unleash destruction upon the world will want this to be readily available. Advocates for characters wanting to curb this power will want this to be rare, controllable, unwieldy, noticeable, dangerous, to come at a cost, or otherwise difficult to use.

The Characters
A la The West Wing, the offices that exist in this game are the same as in the real world, but the office-holders themselves are fictional.

Choose one character to advocate for in the story. You will have a strong degree of control over this character’s actions. In addition, you can control and direct secondary characters, as many as you can get away with. Arguments will be more likely to succeed if they concern characters in the sphere of influence of your advocacy character. For instance, the U.S. director of Intelligence will make stronger arguments concerning a U.S. secret agent than, say, the Pope.

In addition to the characters listed, you may advocate for any head of state, powerful executive, religious leader, or leader of a powerful (or hoping to become powerful) organization.

Dr. Travis Fitzgerald
The first human to uncover the secret of the doomsday weapon. Like any researcher, he is intelligent and dedicated, but what about him let him see what others had overlooked, or been unable to penetrate? How is the secret released, and whom does he release it to? Or is it stolen? Does the doctor himself play an integral role in trying for find a solution to the world crisis that looms? Or is he silenced before his ideas can be spread any further?

Dr. Cynthia Williams-Fitzgerald
A brilliant researcher in her own right and confidant to Travis. Certainly her support and ideas have helped Travis to his discovery. Will she be able to help her husband and partner safely through this crisis? Or will she be one of the first casualties?

U.S. Secretary of Defense Joshua Kappel
This retired general never oversaw military action, but earned great renown for his management, logistical, and administrative skills. No-one else in the world has greater control over a more powerful military machine.
Will conflict prove him to be as brilliant in action as he is in a boardroom? Or will he be incompetent or even corrupt, beholden to a powerful and shadowy “friend” who placed him in the lofty position he holds?

U.K. Intelligence Director Janet Bollings
An administrative genius with over 25 years of experience as a spy and later spymaster, she has turned the British intelligence agencies into the world’s finest through sheer competence and strength of will. Nobody will know better than her underlings who might gain access to the secret device. But she knows all too well that loyalty is never absolute. Who among her best agents and closest friends is waiting only for the right price to betray Queen and country?

Chinese Premier Zhao Fai
She manages the domestic and economic affairs of a sixth of the world’s population. Surely such power can be turned into something great for the China and its people! Can she convince her country’s civilian leadership and its army that such a great power can be used to power an engine of creation rather than destruction?

Iranian Prime Minister Mahyar Solaimani
Solaimani came to power as a moderate leader but feels tremendous pressure on him: too long, his countrymen feel, has Iran been looked down upon by the decadent West. If he gained the destructive power of this weapon, would he keep it in reserve or use it against one of his many rivals? What would he give to gain it? Or perhaps one of his enemies gains control of the secret; would they attack his nation or usurp his control?

Pope Clement XV
A relatively young pope, consecrated promising a new era of liberalism for the Church. But how will he react when the lives of a billion of the faithful are in mortal peril? What resources, overt and secret, is the Holy Father able to martial?

Rev. Joseph Hawkins
A popular and charismatic evangelical minister. He has been preaching the End of Days for years; and it appears that end may actually be at hand. Does he dare to try to wield God’s fire himself? Does he possess the ear, and heart of another world leader?

Commentary

Leave a response »

  1. 1. June 9th, 2007

    For the first session, my players were advocating for:

    Dr. Travis Fitzgerald
    Michael Smith, treacherous grad student of Dr. Fitzgerald
    Janet Bollings, UK Intelligence Director
    Rev. Joseph Hawkins

    The third component ended up being a high level of solar activity–a particular portion of an 11-year cycle that was only a few days from being over.

    Michael Smith ended up successfully delivering the formula to Communist friends in Venezuela, and Joseph Hawkins got a copy of it too, hoping to burn the world in divine fire, but Janet Bollings’s agents successfully delayed them using aggression and sabatoge until the window of opportunity was over. The world is safe, for another 11 years…

    Rob Herman
  2. 2. June 10th, 2007

    Interesting writeup. Have you read/played Wushu? I’d be interested to know how it compares with Engel, considering the similarities.

  3. 3. June 10th, 2007

    I have not played Wushu, though I have read the document.

    In the resolution mechanic, Wushu has the advantage that whatever a player says happens, always happens (to some degree).

    Wushu is designed for over-the-top action and the mechanic that gives a bonus as your description gets more detailed reflects this. By contrast, Engel Matrix puts a premium on keeping your description down to the minimum you want to happen–adding more demands reduces the strength of the argument as a whole. (And therefore the likelihood that any of it will happen.)

    Engel Matrix wouldn’t work well with all characters advocating the same “side.” The GM’s role is very passive–he keeps track of player arguments and based on whether they work, synthesizes them into a summary of What Actually Happens.

    Engel Matrix characters don’t have statistics of any kind; just general understandings of their strengths, weaknesses, and nature that develop over the course of the game. This can be developed (if unspecified) or changed by argument, bearing in mind that arguments are the limited resource of play.

    I will point out that in the game I described above, two player-advocated characters died and in both cases, the players went on without missing a beat. (One player had successfully grabbed an ally; the other one took more direct control of an organization the character had been helping.)

    Rob Herman
  4. 4. June 11th, 2007

    I think something that is worth mentioning is the ending. In the game Rob ran I felt we had trouble wrapping up the session in a suitable climatic movie-esque fashion. More play testing might be required to determine if this is setting\player dependent.

    John
  5. 5. June 11th, 2007

    It’s true.

    I lay some of the blame at:
    1. My inexperience
    2. The total loss of momentum caused by breaking for about 90 minutes for food
    3. The related fact that two of the players were bored and confused at the end.

    I think it would have been better served if we had been able to keep eating through the game (it’s easy, there are no character sheets to mess up) and if I had said about 6-7 arguments from the end “OK, the climax is coming, so arguments will be evaluated in light of that.”

    Rob Herman

Trackbacks

Leave a comment, a trackback from your own site or subscribe to an RSS feed for this entry. Trackback URL for this entry Comments feed for this entry

Leave a response

Leave a URL

Preview